Gadgets of ‘The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo’ (movie)

Anyone who’s read through Stieg Larsson’s Girl with the Dragon Tattoo may have noticed Larsson’s incredible attention to detail. In particular, in naming the gadgets used by the characters, down to the exact product name. The original book takes place sometime in 2002, as is evident by Lisbeth’s arsenal of gadgets. The movie, however, was shot quite a bit later (sometime in 2010-2011).

While watching, I couldn’t help but think of this Engadget piece, in which editor Laura June lists the various pieces of gadgetry used by the protagonists. The disparity between the timelines was unmistakable — unibody MacBook Pros weren’t available in 2002! Anyway, here’s the list.

Book gadgets (from Engadget)

  • First generation iPod.
  • Canon Powershot digital camera.
  • Apple iBook 600.
  • Apple iMac G3.
  • Apple PowerBook G4.
  • Agfa scanner.

Movie gadgets

  • Not a Canon PowerShot Digital Elph camera – It looks like it’s a Sony NEX camera, or some other camera with a thin body and large, off-center lens.
  • Unibody 15-inch MacBook Pro – Both Lisbeth and Mikael use a 15-inch MacBook Pro in the movie, which hit store shelves in late 2008.
  • Epson printer/scanner – This handy little printer+scanner combo spent most of its camera time scanning the cornucopia of photos taken during [REDACTED].

 

 

Samsung’s Super Bowl ad

Twitter reactions:

  • Dear #samsung, 2001 called. It want’s its #stylus back.
  • #stylus #BringBack1998
  • Apple has “Research and Development”, Samsung has… a #stylus! #Fail
  • don’t call it a come back #stylus
  • Somehow The Darkness was not the most out of date element of that Samsung ad #stylus

And then there’s this quote from a few years back:

Steve Jobs: “If you see a stylus, they blew it.”

I don’t think anyone knows what the commercial is actually about until about 1:25 in, and I think that’s called doing it wrong.

 

HTC: big, bulky LTE phones were kinda sucky

SlashGear: HTC: We “dropped the ball” with oversized LTE phones

HTC “dropped the ball” on its 2011 devices, the company’s CFO has admitted, with LTE-equipped handsets simply too thick and offering insufficient battery life. Speaking on the company’s financial results call today, following HTC’s unappealing Q4 2011 results, Chief Financial Officer Winston Yung conceded that HTC had plenty of work to do improving both “design and components.”

 

Honeywell sues Nest Labs over thermostat patents

 

Nest thermostat

Honeywell:

The patents are related to, among other things, simplified methods for operating and programming a thermostat including the use of natural language, user interfaces that facilitate programming and energy savings, a thermostat’s inner design, an electric circuit used to divert power from the user’s home electrical system to provide power to a thermostat, and controlling a thermostat with information stored in a remote location.

Translation: we’re kind of jealous of the Nest (pictured above) thermostat.

That’s not surprising after taking a look at Honeywell’s thermostat catalog.

Twitter during the Super Bowl

A few interesting tidbits on how people tweeted during the Super Bowl

In the final three minutes of the Super Bowl tonight, there were an average of 10,000 Tweets per second.

Also:

Madonna’s performance during the Super Bowl’s halftime show saw an average of 8,000 Tweets per second for five minutes.

And lastly,

The highest Tweets per second #SuperBowl peak came at the end of the game: 12,233. 2nd highest was during Madonna’s performance: 10,245.

 

Netflix original show ‘Lilyhammer’ now available on instant stream

Netflix’s first original show is now available today for Netflix streaming subscribers. I haven’t watched the show yet, but it looks interesting. This is just the start, really, with more original content coming soon. I guess that letter had something to it.

“Lilyhammer,” follows New York mobster Frank “The Fixer” Tagliano as he enters the federal witness protection program after ratting on his boss. A sports fan, Frank wants to make his new life in Lillehammer, the Norwegian town that hosted the 1994 Winter Olympics – or as he calls it “Lilyhammer.” Frank has visions of a paradise of “clean air, fresh white snow and gorgeous broads” far away from the temptations of the Big Apple and from mob hit men. Reality, of course, turns out to be spectacularly different.

8-bit Skyrim trailer

Philosophy of tech companies

AAPL Orchard (via Daring Fireball): Not Everyone Copies Apple

Distinct CEO terminology, Apple vs Sony.

Apple: best, world, delight, proud.

Sony: growth, business, accelerate, domains.

Interesting Facebook facts

  • 845 million monthly active users as of December 31, 2011, an increase of 39% as compared to 608 million monthly active users as of December 31, 2010.
  • 483 million daily active users on average in December 2011, an increase of 48% as compared to 327 million daily active users in December 2010.
  • Over 425 million monthly active users who used Facebook mobile products in December 2011.
  • During the month of December 2011, Facebook had an average of 360 million users who were active with Facebook at least 6 out of the 7 days of the week.
  • There were more than 100 billion friend connections on Facebook as of December 31, 2011.
  • 250 million photos per day were uploaded to Facebook from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.
  • Users generated an average of 2.7 billion Likes and Comments per day during the three months ended December 31, 2011.
  • More than 12% of Facebook’s revenue in 2011 came from Zynga, makers of Farmville .
  • 68 percent of Facebook’s revenue comes from ads or Zynga.

Letter from Zuck

In case you haven’t heard, Facebook filed for IPO (initial public offering), meaning the company will be trading publicly in the stock market (as FB for those interested). Below is a letter from Zuck, in which he talks about Facebook’s goals going forward. It’s definitely a good read, if nothing else.

Facebook was not originally created to be a company. It was built to accomplish a social mission — to make the world more open and connected.

We think it’s important that everyone who invests in Facebook understands what this mission means to us, how we make decisions and why we do the things we do. I will try to outline our approach in this letter.

At Facebook, we’re inspired by technologies that have revolutionized how people spread and consume information. We often talk about inventions like the printing press and the television — by simply making communication more efficient, they led to a complete transformation of many important parts of society. They gave more people a voice. They encouraged progress. They changed the way society was organized. They brought us closer together.

Today, our society has reached another tipping point. We live at a moment when the majority of people in the world have access to the internet or mobile phones — the raw tools necessary to start sharing what they’re thinking, feeling and doing with whomever they want. Facebook aspires to build the services that give people the power to share and help them once again transform many of our core institutions and industries.

There is a huge need and a huge opportunity to get everyone in the world connected, to give everyone a voice and to help transform society for the future. The scale of the technology and infrastructure that must be built is unprecedented, and we believe this is the most important problem we can focus on.

We hope to strengthen how people relate to each other.

Even if our mission sounds big, it starts small — with the relationship between two people.

Personal relationships are the fundamental unit of our society. Relationships are how we discover new ideas, understand our world and ultimately derive long-term happiness.

At Facebook, we build tools to help people connect with the people they want and share what they want, and by doing this we are extending people’s capacity to build and maintain relationships.

People sharing more — even if just with their close friends or families — creates a more open culture and leads to a better understanding of the lives and perspectives of others. We believe that this creates a greater number of stronger relationships between people, and that it helps people get exposed to a greater number of diverse perspectives.

By helping people form these connections, we hope to rewire the way people spread and consume information. We think the world’s information infrastructure should resemble the social graph — a network built from the bottom up or peer-to-peer, rather than the monolithic, top-down structure that has existed to date. We also believe that giving people control over what they share is a fundamental principle of this rewiring.

We have already helped more than 800 million people map out more than 100 billion connections so far, and our goal is to help this rewiring accelerate.

We hope to improve how people connect to businesses and the economy.

We think a more open and connected world will help create a stronger economy with more authentic businesses that build better products and services.

As people share more, they have access to more opinions from the people they trust about the products and services they use. This makes it easier to discover the best products and improve the quality and efficiency of their lives.

One result of making it easier to find better products is that businesses will be rewarded for building better products — ones that are personalized and designed around people. We have found that products that are “social by design” tend to be more engaging than their traditional counterparts, and we look forward to seeing more of the world’s products move in this direction.

Our developer platform has already enabled hundreds of thousands of businesses to build higher-quality and more social products. We have seen disruptive new approaches in industries like games, music and news, and we expect to see similar disruption in more industries by new approaches that are social by design.

In addition to building better products, a more open world will also encourage businesses to engage with their customers directly and authentically. More than four million businesses have Pages on Facebook that they use to have a dialogue with their customers. We expect this trend to grow as well.

We hope to change how people relate to their governments and social institutions.

We believe building tools to help people share can bring a more honest and transparent dialogue around government that could lead to more direct empowerment of people, more accountability for officials and better solutions to some of the biggest problems of our time.

By giving people the power to share, we are starting to see people make their voices heard on a different scale from what has historically been possible. These voices will increase in number and volume. They cannot be ignored. Over time, we expect governments will become more responsive to issues and concerns raised directly by all their people rather than through intermediaries controlled by a select few.

Through this process, we believe that leaders will emerge across all countries who are pro-internet and fight for the rights of their people, including the right to share what they want and the right to access all information that people want to share with them.

Finally, as more of the economy moves towards higher-quality products that are personalized, we also expect to see the emergence of new services that are social by design to address the large worldwide problems we face in job creation, education and health care. We look forward to doing what we can to help this progress.

Our Mission and Our Business

As I said above, Facebook was not originally founded to be a company. We’ve always cared primarily about our social mission, the services we’re building and the people who use them. This is a different approach for a public company to take, so I want to explain why I think it works.

I started off by writing the first version of Facebook myself because it was something I wanted to exist. Since then, most of the ideas and code that have gone into Facebook have come from the great people we’ve attracted to our team.

Most great people care primarily about building and being a part of great things, but they also want to make money. Through the process of building a team — and also building a developer community, advertising market and investor base — I’ve developed a deep appreciation for how building a strong company with a strong economic engine and strong growth can be the best way to align many people to solve important problems.

Simply put: we don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.

And we think this is a good way to build something. These days I think more and more people want to use services from companies that believe in something beyond simply maximizing profits.

By focusing on our mission and building great services, we believe we will create the most value for our shareholders and partners over the long term — and this in turn will enable us to keep attracting the best people and building more great services. We don’t wake up in the morning with the primary goal of making money, but we understand that the best way to achieve our mission is to build a strong and valuable company.

This is how we think about our IPO as well. We’re going public for our employees and our investors. We made a commitment to them when we gave them equity that we’d work hard to make it worth a lot and make it liquid, and this IPO is fulfilling our commitment. As we become a public company, we’re making a similar commitment to our new investors and we will work just as hard to fulfill it.

The Hacker Way

As part of building a strong company, we work hard at making Facebook the best place for great people to have a big impact on the world and learn from other great people. We have cultivated a unique culture and management approach that we call the Hacker Way.

The word “hacker” has an unfairly negative connotation from being portrayed in the media as people who break into computers. In reality, hacking just means building something quickly or testing the boundaries of what can be done. Like most things, it can be used for good or bad, but the vast majority of hackers I’ve met tend to be idealistic people who want to have a positive impact on the world.

The Hacker Way is an approach to building that involves continuous improvement and iteration. Hackers believe that something can always be better, and that nothing is ever complete. They just have to go fix it — often in the face of people who say it’s impossible or are content with the status quo.

Hackers try to build the best services over the long term by quickly releasing and learning from smaller iterations rather than trying to get everything right all at once. To support this, we have built a testing framework that at any given time can try out thousands of versions of Facebook. We have the words “Done is better than perfect” painted on our walls to remind ourselves to always keep shipping.

Hacking is also an inherently hands-on and active discipline. Instead of debating for days whether a new idea is possible or what the best way to build something is, hackers would rather just prototype something and see what works. There’s a hacker mantra that you’ll hear a lot around Facebook offices: “Code wins arguments.”

Hacker culture is also extremely open and meritocratic. Hackers believe that the best idea and implementation should always win — not the person who is best at lobbying for an idea or the person who manages the most people.

To encourage this approach, every few months we have a hackathon, where everyone builds prototypes for new ideas they have. At the end, the whole team gets together and looks at everything that has been built. Many of our most successful products came out of hackathons, including Timeline, chat, video, our mobile development framework and some of our most important infrastructure like the HipHop compiler.

To make sure all our engineers share this approach, we require all new engineers — even managers whose primary job will not be to write code — to go through a program called Bootcamp where they learn our codebase, our tools and our approach. There are a lot of folks in the industry who manage engineers and don’t want to code themselves, but the type of hands-on people we’re looking for are willing and able to go through Bootcamp.

The examples above all relate to engineering, but we have distilled these principles into five core values for how we run Facebook:

Focus on Impact

If we want to have the biggest impact, the best way to do this is to make sure we always focus on solving the most important problems. It sounds simple, but we think most companies do this poorly and waste a lot of time. We expect everyone at Facebook to be good at finding the biggest problems to work on.

Move Fast

Moving fast enables us to build more things and learn faster. However, as most companies grow, they slow down too much because they’re more afraid of making mistakes than they are of losing opportunities by moving too slowly. We have a saying: “Move fast and break things.” The idea is that if you never break anything, you’re probably not moving fast enough.

Be Bold

Building great things means taking risks. This can be scary and prevents most companies from doing the bold things they should. However, in a world that’s changing so quickly, you’re guaranteed to fail if you don’t take any risks. We have another saying: “The riskiest thing is to take no risks.” We encourage everyone to make bold decisions, even if that means being wrong some of the time.

Be Open

We believe that a more open world is a better world because people with more information can make better decisions and have a greater impact. That goes for running our company as well. We work hard to make sure everyone at Facebook has access to as much information as possible about every part of the company so they can make the best decisions and have the greatest impact.

Build Social Value

Once again, Facebook exists to make the world more open and connected, and not just to build a company. We expect everyone at Facebook to focus every day on how to build real value for the world in everything they do.

Thanks for taking the time to read this letter. We believe that we have an opportunity to have an important impact on the world and build a lasting company in the process. I look forward to building something great together.

Professor holds class without cell service or wifi

Time via (LoopInsight): Yale Professor Moves Class to Room Without Wi-Fi. Cue Outrage.

The well-known professor tells the Yale Daily News he wanted the darker room so students could see the projected images of art better, enhancing the classroom experience. Add the darker room to the fact there was no wi-fi availability and he had a lecture hall he could get used to.

“In the past many students in the lecture were doing Facebook or email or all kinds of things on their computers,” Nemerov tells the Yale paper. “So for me it’s better if there’s a room where that is not possible, and one of the unfortunate effects of that is that I have to limit the enrollment of the class to the capacity of the auditorium.”

I see the professor’s logic here. However, I am in a similar situation this semester, and it’s pretty much hell.

Cell phones and dating facts

Vancouver Sun (via BGR): Android users more likely to have sex on first date: Survey

At 55 per cent, Android users also were the most likely to have one-night stands. According to the survey results, 50 per cent of iPhone users have had a one-night stand and 47.6 per cent of Blackberry users said also they had had a one-night stand.

Android users also were the most active visitors of dating websites, at 72 per cent. That compared to 58 per cent of those with iPhones and 50 per cent of people who have BlackBerrys.

Those with an iPhone were most likely to date a co-worker, with nearly a quarter of such singles saying they’ve had a workplace romance within the last five years.

I will differ all comments to my Nexus One.

Sticking it to GameStop and giving back to the publisher

Ars Technica: Parcel Gamer wants to share used game profits with publishers

At first, the concept behind the site sounds too good to be true. Not only does Kennedy plan to pay “30 percent more for your trade-ins than the corner retail store,” and offer free shipping both ways, but he also promises that used games purchased from Parcel Gamer will include access to Online Passes and all the free downloadable content that’s included with a new copy of the game. Not only that, but Kennedy promises to pay 10 percent of the used sale price (usually $3 to $5, he says) back to the publishers, helping compensate them for any new sales they’re losing and helping to solve the industry’s main problem with used games.

Will Parcel Gamer really be able to do all this while maintaining a viable business model? Kennedy says that it will, thanks to significantly lower profit margins and overhead than major brick-and-mortar retailers. He gave an example where the site pays out $30 for a recent release, then resells it for a cheaper-than-new $55. That leaves enough margin to purchase a $10 online pass, pay $5.50 to the publisher, pay $4 for round trip shipping, and still reap $5.50 in actual profit, he said.

Parcel Gamer’s Mike Kennedy seems to have an interesting take on how to funnel money from used video game sales back to the publishers. Having previously worked in an environment where making and selling content was a major part of our business plan, I can see this gaining ground. It seems to be headed somewhere — Parcel Gamer has gotten “one major publisher” to sign on and plans on adding a handful by this summer. I’m hoping this goes somewhere. I really like this idea.

Facebook stock: ‘Go the f**k to sleep’

All Things D: Go the F**k Back to Sleep, Silicon Valley: Facebook IPO Likely to File Later Today at Earliest

If you give a  about Facebook’s stock going public today, All Things D claims that it isn’t going to happen “until this afternoon, after the markets close, at the earliest.” It’s expected to boost Facebook’s wealth, but by how much we don’t know yet.

In other words, blah, blah, blah until we get the real numbers

BlackBerry’s Be Bold team

Mobile Syrup: RIM creates 4 cartoon characters to spread the “Be Bold” message

Be bold team

This is a thing that exists.

The negative $70 million buzzword

Dustin Curtis: Motorola’s Buzzwords and Made up Names

Here are a few of Motorola’s buzzwords of 2011:

Unveiled the award-winning DROID 4 by Motorola

Announced the “life proof” Motorola DEFY™ MINI and slim MOTOLUXE™

Shipped award-winning MOTOACTV™

And what did they end up with? 70 million fewer dollars than they did three months before.

Fact: buzzwords be expensive, yo.

Samsung’s got every inch covered

Screen sizes in inches for Samsung smartphones and tablets:

  • 3
  • 3.2
  • 3.5
  • 3.7
  • 4
  • 4.3
  • 4.5
  • 4.52
  • 4.65
  • 5.3
  • 7
  • 7.7
  • 8.9
  • 10.1

With an average difference between the sizes being 0.54-inches, it’s almost comical. Oh, and they’ve got a tablet of the 11.6-inch variety rumored to be coming soon. The real question here is where is Samsung’s 4.15433-inch smartphone? I really think that’s the sweet spot for smartphones and a missed opportunity.

‘Big Bang Theory’ plugs Siri

 

Smiling in your Facebook photo

ReadWriteWeb: Why You Should Smile in Your Facebook Profile Photo

People who smile more in their public Facebook photos tend to have better social relationships. Past research, which the study thoroughly references, shows that people who smile in photos are generally warmer and friendlier than their sad face counterparts. The smilier they are, the easier time they have with social relationships. Heightened smiling intensity in said photos correlates with greater life satisfaction, mostly through good relationships with others.

What’s the word on having a coffee mug covering the lower half of your face?

For HTC, less is more

Mobile Today Magazine: HTC is holding out for a market hero

HTC UK executive director Phil Roberson:

We have to get back to focusing on what made us great – amazing hardware and a great customer experience. We ended 2011 with far more products than we started out with. We tried to do too much.

So 2012 is about giving our customers something special. We need to make sure we do not go so far down the line that we segment our products by launching lots of different SKUs.

When the only thing differentiating essentially two identical handsets is the inclusion of Beats Audio, you’re doing it wrong.